The air in Stockholm

I ride my bike every­day to work and back. It’s great! Stock­holm is adapted for bikes and there isn’t much cars com­pared to other cities. But even though they are few com­pared to most other major cities, they bug me as a cyclist. I grew up in Visby, where there hardly is any traf­fic at all (with the summer as an excep­tion). The air in Stock­holm is quite dense and smells ter­ri­ble of exhaust gases. This is espe­cially true if you ride your bike amongst them, as I do. So as a little exper­i­ment I will wear this res­pi­ra­tor as a pro­tec­tion against the dust, the par­ti­cles and the exhaust gases.

My respirator

At the end of this week (after three days of com­mut­ing) I will com­pare the images of the mask.
Sounds like fun? Please KOPIMI, and do this yourself!

Focus on your employees

One strat­egy to become a com­pete­tive and attrac­tive employer is to treat your employ­ees as your cus­tomers. A work­place should con­sist of more than sales and sal­lar­ies. Mean­ing is of greater impor­tance. David over at 37signals wrote beau­ti­fully about this in “Put a dent in the uni­verse“:

“To truly be inspired for great work, you need to know that you’re making a dif­fer­ence. That you’re putting a mean­ing­ful dent in the uni­verse. That you’re part of some­thing that’s making a dif­fer­ence and that your role in that some­thing is significant.”

This is very true. The ques­tion is, how do you make your work­place sig­nif­i­cant? When you write PM’s, what are you focus­ing on? My guess is that you focus on how your prod­uct line will improve over the next months, how last months sales went and then you finish up with a promise about that upcom­ing manda­tory hol­i­day party you’ll be arrang­ing. Where is the sig­nif­i­cance in this to me as an employee?

To me as an employee, it is useful to know the num­bers, but only if my even­tual feed­back on these num­bers will ever be con­sid­ered and treated with respect. If not, I actu­ally don’t give a damn. And why should I?

If your employ­ees are lim­ited to a box where they can post ideas about even­tual improve­ments you might con­sider some time in the future, expect no love. The formal author­ity must be shared in order to open up for real love and prac­ti­cal use of the col­lec­tive bril­liance of your team.

I you as an employer look at your employ­ees as your cus­tomers, you’ll con­stantly try to make your offer look and work better for them. You’ll always try to improve, and you’ll do your best to keep them more than sat­is­fied. In fact, you’ll do your best to make them love your sweet deal. You want them to feel impor­tant, as if their work really mat­tered. And of course, it does. You can’t  fake this, if you’re clue­less about how to approach this, ask some­one for advices.

A basic course in mar­ket­ing teaches you that your com­pany have to have a story towards your cus­tomers. What story are you telling your employ­ees? Or even better, what sto­ries are you and your employ­ees making, together? Do you have any tools for this? Are you shar­ing your love for your work with the world? In which way are your work improv­ing the world? In which way are your work improv­ing itself? In what way are you help­ing your employ­ees grow? If your work isn’t devel­op­ing the world right now, then change cus­tomers! Help your cus­tomers make the right choices. Make your work important!

Making use of Web 2.0

Today when a client asks me to build a web site containing:

  • Blogs, mem­bers need to be able to blog
  • Mar­ket­place, like eBay
  • Photo gallery
  • Forum
  • Cal­en­der
  • Edi­to­r­ial space (for arti­cles and fluffies)

my advice to them is always the same.

“You don’t need to. Let’s use what’s already out there”

Our roles as web devel­op­ers/ web strate­gists is shift­ing within this new era when most of the base func­tion­al­ity such as blogs, social net­works, cal­en­ders, project col­lab­o­ra­tion and even video edi­tors are actu­ally avail­able for free already! In this vast space of ter­abytes there is more then enough apps to meet the cus­tomers need. Why rein­vent the wheel?

Most of the traffic/market/people/users are already on Face­book for exam­ple. How do we reach them through that spe­cific chan­nel? Within Face­book there are room for groups, events, mes­sages and even com­mu­nity based games. It’s perfect!

So, insted of forc­ing the users to join yet another social net­work / sign up for a cam­paign, let’s make it easy for them. That should be our main goal, I think. To make it easy for the user.

ps. If any cus­tomer feels tar­geted by this, don’t. I get requests like these all the time, and there is noth­ing wrong with it. It’s just up to us web // whatever  (we’ve got LOTS of dif­fer­ent titles, but mostly we are the same) to get you on the right track. It’s our respon­si­bil­ity as experts to lead the field and to make the best out of your ini­tial idea.

Everyone is just an email away

Right now I’m chat­ting (that’s jab­ber­ing) with Pontus, my big little brother. He is right now in San Juan Del Sur, in Nicaragua and I’m in Stock­holm. Every time I have a con­ver­sa­tion in an instant with some­one who’s so far away, I can’t just let it go. I find it amazing!

It’s just as with email. Do some­one inspire you? Send them an email and ask your ques­tions and send them your thanks! Oftenly they’ll have the time to answer it. It’s sweet, in the online world, every­one is just an email away.

Fairtunes

Fair­tunes is a free, vol­un­tary, dig­i­tal music pay­ment system that allows music fans to vol­un­tar­ily send money to, com­pen­sate or tip, any artist for their work. Fair­tunes empow­ers any artist to receive money online in the form of a vol­un­tary pay­ment. “

Fair­tunes was a com­pany formed in the year 2000 that then got bought up and renamed to Musi­clink in 2002. In the Musi­clink ver­sion, the “sending-money-to-music-creator”-feature was dis­abled. The founders got weblogs where you can find related infor­ma­tion: Matt Goyer and John Cormie.

The idea, was to enable users to send money to music creators.

It soon got quite exten­sive press coverage:

Remem­ber, this was back in 2000/2001.

Matt Rigaux com­mented on the arti­cle Moving the goal recently this year (2008):

“During the first bubble, a friend of mine had a site in 2000 called Fair​tunes.com, which was a “tipping service”. If you wanted the labels out of the way in order to pay the artist directly for their work, you could send money to Fair­tunes and they would remit cheques to the man­agers of what­ever artist you chose. In the begin­ning they were send­ing $2.00 cheques to people like David Bowie, but it was early, and it was more of a signal of what was pos­si­ble than any­thing else.

Their model relied on the honor system, in that of course not every­one was going to vol­un­tar­ily pay artists for songs they down­load for free, but some would, and the theory was that this would approx­i­mately equal what the artist would get from higher volume sales – LESS the labels’ cut. Great idea, and they got national atten­tion due to the Nap­ster craze, but to Fred’s point, there was too much fric­tion in the process of get­ting money to them that most didn’t adopt it and it fiz­zled out.

For me per­son­ally, the most fric­tion­less way to get this done would be if a ser­vice pen­nies just got added to my monthly inter­net or cell phone bill, and I got to make one pay­ment a month for all my music. My part of the process would be com­plete and it would be out of my hands, and the ser­vice would just remit trans­ac­tion fees back to the car­ri­ers, artists, man­agers, labels, etc.

Would love to see a Fair­tunes model re-​emerge, but to make it fric­tion­less, the pay­ments have to be dig­i­tal, added on to exist­ing things I’m locked into paying for reg­u­larly, and divis­i­ble fairly amongst the stake­hold­ers that cre­ated the con­tent and enabled that fric­tion­less payment.”

I second that. That is an excit­ing solu­tion to a unprac­ti­cal problem.

Why havn’t anyone tried since then?