The data pwnage issue

I depend on web services:

All of these web ser­vices are easy to use and free.
I love to use them, they keep my head clear and makes my life easier.

The data and con­tent that I pro­duce is stored on their servers and very often there is not an option to store it else­where. I usu­ally think that this is a fea­ture, but lately I’ve gotten more and more con­cerned about it.
Is this really what we wanted the Inter­net to become?
Web 2.0 seems like inter­ac­tive tele­vi­sion, and these ser­vices fit good as channels.

The Inter­net is decen­tral­ized, open and free.
What hap­pens if Flickr dies, or Google? Face­book? The power of the Inter­net is that it’s decen­tral­ized by nature. If one server goes down, it doesn’t mean that any other one will. That’s how it should be!

There are a lot of dif­fer­ent ini­tia­tives out there pro­mot­ing data porta­bil­ity between dif­fer­ent ser­vices. Mostly it seems to be a matter of comfort:

  • Why should I have to re-​enter the same data (name, age, occu­pa­tion etc) when it’s already avail­able at one place?

Two years ago, 5/9/2009 a blog post enti­tled “A Bill of Rights for Users of the Social Web” declared that users of social net­works should be enti­tled to the fol­low­ing rights:

  • Own­er­ship of their own per­sonal infor­ma­tion, includ­ing:
    • their own pro­file data
    • the list of people they are con­nected to
    • the activ­ity stream of con­tent they create;
  • Con­trol of whether and how such per­sonal infor­ma­tion is shared with others; and
  • Free­dom to grant per­sis­tent access to their per­sonal infor­ma­tion to trusted exter­nal sites.

Sites sup­port­ing these rights shall:

  • Allow their users to syn­di­cate their own pro­file data, their friends list, and the data that’s shared with them via the ser­vice, using a per­sis­tent URL or API token and open data formats;
  • Allow their users to syn­di­cate their own stream of activ­ity out­side the site;
  • Allow their users to link from their pro­file pages to exter­nal iden­ti­fiers in a public way; and
  • Allow their users to dis­cover who else they know is also on their site, using the same exter­nal iden­ti­fiers made avail­able for lookup within the service.

This is all jolly and good :) ! A little less than a year later, all sorts of ini­tia­tives to make the dif­fer­ent net­works more open popped up! OpenSo­cial is one.

The data pwnage and loca­tion prob­lem still exist though, and I’ve not yet heard about a solu­tion to it. Is this the next big ques­tion for all of these ser­vices? When will the users demand full con­trol over their data?

As the Inter­net matures, so does it’s users.
And then it’s only a matter of time and a few scandals.

National Geographic on food

Corn fields. Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimmediaart/

Just fin­ished read­ing the Swedish edi­tion of National Geo­graphic (#6).
One arti­cle was about the global food market.

Last year, the price for food was exceed­ing any pre­vi­ous levels.
The reason for this was that there wasn’t enough food in the world to feed every­one.
This lim­i­ta­tion is some­thing that we earth­lings always will face.
How many per­sons can this planet feed?
Will we have to reg­u­late births in the future, as the do in China?

Olagliga konsten

Diskuterade den uppmärksammade kon­sten som var aktuell i våras med mina farföräldrar ikväll.
Sammanfattningsvis:

Kon­st­fack och min­is­trar skall ge fan i att definiera vad kon­sten skall vara eller inte vara. Poliser och åklagare skall utreda och besluta kring huru­vida händelser är brottsliga.

Right now I’m reading

  • ‘Urban Tantra: Sacred Sex for the Twenty-​First Century’ by Bar­bara Carellas
  • ‘The Seven-​Day Weekend’ by Ricardo Semler
  • ‘Rules of Play’ by Katie Salen and Eric Zimmerman
  • ‘PHP 5 Objects, Pat­terns, and Practice’ by Matt Zandstra
  • ‘Designing Interactions’ by Bill Moggridge